July 2017

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Fernando Valencia, from its old location at User:Ziv921/sandbox/Fernando Marin Valencia. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 19:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fernando Valencia (July 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 21:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fernando Valencia has been accepted

edit
 
Fernando Valencia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

August 2017

edit


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ziv921 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I did not use ITGuru account, I am his friend and he asked me to ask a question on the online chat. I did not use his account or made any changes on his account.

Accept reason:

Procedural accept since another admin has already unblocked. This does not imply any position on the socking allegation. Just Chilling (talk) 19:38, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

To the reviewing admin, note an identical unblock request has been made at User talk:ITGuru. --Yamla (talk) 18:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply