Zeppelin85

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Rory096 08:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. --Rory096 08:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

I've already found the error I made in earlier reversion. The deletion discussion link is restored and the article is still cleared of the inflammatory edits by either myself or the anonymous vandals. Thanks for helping me catch the mistake.--User Zeppelin85

Your most recent edit is good, thanks for fixing the problem. --Rory096 08:18, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. I apologize for the confusion. I made the error in thinking that the revision from Wiki admin was "hard-coded" into the existing header. I forgot that it's also a part of the edit page and subject to reversion. Apologize for the mistake, won't make it again. --User Zeppelin85

Ron Horsley

Please don't add criminal accusations to wikipedia pages without some very good backing material. It's vandalism, and can put both you and wikipedia in legal trouble AKAF 06:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

If you persist, you will be blocked. Please bear that in mind. Johnleemk | Talk 10:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Mary, I have to agree with this. I already know about Mr. Lee admitting to child molestation on the "Other Dark Place" message board, and know that he's already been reported to the Tampa, FL authorities for those concerns and they are investigating accordingly to see if he needs to either answer for formal charges or at least be directed to some official counseling.

If there's legitimate consequences and authorities for his actions, let those be taken and by the people empowered to do so. I am tired of getting emails about this issue and about what everybody wants to know regarding Robert or his issues with abusing kids.

I appreciate you putting up a page about me, but this is NOT the place to spout that kind of thing and if this kind of stuff keeps up I'm going to formally ask Wiki myself to take down this page. If you're going to contribute to Wiki or wherever, do it with some sense towards achieving something, not just 'one-upping' someone else when all of it doesn't even matter. Your heart's in the right place, but your actions are taking you down to the same level as the people you're vilifying. Thank you. --Ron Horsley

Non-free rationale for File:Midnight-cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Midnight-cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC)