December 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Jockzain. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Siddhanta Mahapatra, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jockzain (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit summary here [1] is absolutely not appropriate for Wikipedia. Editing disputes are common on Wikipedia, but you must handle them respectfully through discussion, not through petty insults directed towards another editor. You can end up blocked from editing for comments like this. Please don't do it again. Ravensfire (talk) 18:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Ravensfire, I would suggest doing this activity (TWA), good luck. 多多123 () 20:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sidhant Mohapatra have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 00:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sidhant Mohapatra, you may be blocked from editing. Information like spouses, parents and number of children MUST be supported by a reliable source and covered in the article. Please read WP:BLP. You may be blocked from further editing if this continues. Ravensfire (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sidhant Mohapatra. Tacyarg (talk) 17:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:LoVleyAhmed per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dismant39. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 12:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply