unblock|I did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to deserve my 48-hour block's change to indefinite

Reviewed. No this account was used for nothing but vandalism and the blocking admin extended the block since the same vandalism continued after this was blocked using a sockpuppet. --pgk(talk) 16:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Z6~enwiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

User:Francs2000 did not have CheckUser access at the time, so what proof is there that I used a sockpuppet after being blocked 48 hours?

Decline reason:

Obvious cases of sockpuppetry do not require checkuser access


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then what obvious proof is there that I used a sockpuppet? Apparently the "What links here" link from my user page brings up User:V9, but that user did not engage in the same vandalism I did. --Z6 19:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

04:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

20:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)