YusrSehl

Please write your personal notes below and do not forget to sign.

Speedy deletion of Glass Science

A tag has been placed on Glass Science requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DefenseSupportParty (talk) 07:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Glass Science

I understand your concern on the Glass Science article. The reason I nominated it for deletion is because contextually, it had nearly no content. The title made no connection with the content of the article. I didn't intend any offense by nominating it; I simply feel it isn't of an encyclopedic caliber yet.

I would recommend starting the article on a sandbox page, and once finishing it to an extent that explains it, post it to the article. I'm not going to remove my deletion tag, as the article hasn't been expanded enough to consider keeping it. Should you need any help starting a User Sandbox page, give me a ring on my talk page and I would be more than happy to help. However, the article as it stands isn't enough to consider keeping (Read: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion). DefenseSupportParty (talk) 07:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, just as an addendum, you can feel free to contest my nomination for deletion; it's completely within your rights. If you want to argue your point with an admin, just edit the page and add {{hangon}} to the page. Cheers. DefenseSupportParty (talk) 08:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)