Yolo210

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yolo210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The QBA-bot has apparently blocked me for using a proxy which I was not.

Decline reason:

In order to look into this, we need to know the IP involved. If you do not want to post it publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide it privately. 331dot (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2024

Hi Yolo210! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Kidult that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 10:44, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Yolo210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Apparently, I have been blocked for “consistent vandalism” but I do not see what made the admin choose that. Many of my edits were made to articles on sensitive topics, however, these edits seem to have been accepted by the Wikipedia community and have not been undone. And I definitely do not understand how my actions could be categorized as “consistent vandalism”. Yolo210 (talk) 00:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Apparently, I have been blocked for “consistent vandalism” but I do not see what made the admin choose that. Many of my edits were made to articles on sensitive topics, however, these edits seem to have been accepted by the Wikipedia community and have not been undone. And I definitely do not understand how my actions could be categorized as “consistent vandalism”. [[User:Yolo210|Yolo210]] ([[User talk:Yolo210#top|talk]]) 00:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Apparently, I have been blocked for “consistent vandalism” but I do not see what made the admin choose that. Many of my edits were made to articles on sensitive topics, however, these edits seem to have been accepted by the Wikipedia community and have not been undone. And I definitely do not understand how my actions could be categorized as “consistent vandalism”. [[User:Yolo210|Yolo210]] ([[User talk:Yolo210#top|talk]]) 00:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Apparently, I have been blocked for “consistent vandalism” but I do not see what made the admin choose that. Many of my edits were made to articles on sensitive topics, however, these edits seem to have been accepted by the Wikipedia community and have not been undone. And I definitely do not understand how my actions could be categorized as “consistent vandalism”. [[User:Yolo210|Yolo210]] ([[User talk:Yolo210#top|talk]]) 00:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Please place new posts at the bottom; this may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". Your edits appear to have tripped an edit filter meant to prevent vandalism, probably due to the subject matter of your edits. HJ Mitchell, is that the case? 331dot (talk) 08:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)