Yilian Wong
October 2022
edit
Hello, I'm Johnj1995. I noticed that you recently removed content from Li Hongzhi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- John, thank you for the notification. You did not make mistake. It was my fault did not leave an edit summary. I am new to Wikipedia. I will try to do better next time. Thank you for your kindness and patience with my mistake. Yilian Yilian Wong (talk) 20:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Indef
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. A reply to your letter on my page
editHi,
If reliable source(s) agree with a statement, it isn't wrong to write it to the page "Li Hongzhi". (in a neutral way) Some neutral statements are interpreted as defamatory by Falun Gong practitioners. For example, some Falun Gong practitioners on Wikipedia and elsewhere try to remove the following types of content:
- the point of view of the Chinese government, which is important (because it's one of the parties involved in the conflict);
- the point of view of reliable sources that are critical of Falun Gong;
- facts that may discredit Falun Gong.
However, this is wrong. There is no problem with adding these as long as they respect the Wikipedia policies AAAAA143222 (talk) 22:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)