Critique an article

edit

Aroma_compund

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

This article is very neutral since it is mostly about scientific facts. And the facts listed as I know was all non-biased.

Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

According to the references, they are all reliable sources.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?

Citations I checked are all working. I did not find any plagiarism in this article.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

According to references, they are all published after 2000s, so they are not out of date.