January 2010 edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kuldip Singh Chandpuri. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 20:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Kuldip Singh Chandpuri. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -SpacemanSpiff 20:33, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have been removing the edits of Mrpontiac and his ip 115 *** and his new sock account Thisissparta I have done nothing wrong Elockid has previously aided Mrpontiac1 before on previous articles and it always ends with elockids eidts being removed because users realise that he was re adding mrpontiac1s edits he regularly gets messages from Mrpontiac1 praising him I think its this that makes him side with the banned user his ip59 and 115 have sent messages to him and I have proof of this to thanks Xero675 (talk) 20:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply