Speedy deletion of International Task Force on Preventive Diplomacy

edit
 

A tag has been placed on International Task Force on Preventive Diplomacy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (EhJJ)TALK 18:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

International Task Force on Preventive Diplomacy

edit

Hi Stifle,

the article "International Task Force on Preventive Diplomacy" has been speedily deleted.

This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement.

However, I am a member of the EWI Institute (you can find me on the staff list) and have explicit permission to put this text, which was taken from the website, on Wikipedia.

How to proceed?


Thanks for your consideration and your time.

Sincerely,


Ward Vanhee —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wvanhee (talkcontribs) 10:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please have a person with an email address ending in @preventivediplomacy.org send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org stating that the text at preventivediplomacy.org is released under version 1.2 of the GNU Free Documentation License, with no Front-Cover Text, no Back-Cover Text, and no Invariant Sections. This email will be processed by our OTRS team and, assuming there are no problems, the page will be restored.
Alternatively you may place such a statement on the source website. Please mention the article title International Task Force on Preventive Diplomacy in your message so that it can be cross-referenced. If you choose this option then let me know when the statement has been added and I will restore the page. Stifle (talk) 10:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
 

The article International Task Force on Preventive Diplomacy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Despite all the big name people supposedly associated with this task force, I could not find multiple substantial RS refs covering it.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply