Wrestlover
Joined 28 February 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Richard BB in topic April 2013
April 2013
edit
Hello, I'm STATicVerseatide. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to WrestleMania XXVIII seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 03:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Really, I'd love for you to explain how my was in any way POV. The tagline for WrestleMania 28 was "Once in a Lifetime", which was confirmed as a fallacy when the WrestleMania 29 main event was booked in January. Since we're throwing around doctrines, here's one for you: WP:OWN. Wrestlover (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Static isn't violating WP:OWN just by disagreeing with your edit. I would have to agree with him: "fallacy" is a very opinionated word when used in this context. We should allow the reader to make their own mind up. We've stated that there was a rematch, but by saying that the tagline was a fallacy is your conjecture. Also, regarding the comments of mine you removed: you may be uninterested in what I had to say, but being overtly belligerent will only hinder your ability to be a part of this community. — Richard BB 12:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oh well, I guess I don't have enough standing in the boys club yet to make an edit to that particular article. Seems I've ventured across the line where Wikipedia becomes Agendapedia. IN MY OPINION ;) Good day. Wrestlover (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'd once more point you towards WP:AGF. In fact, forget that — perhaps WP:SCREW is more accurate. There is no agenda-driven conspiracy to eliminate the edits of newer users. You'll notice that your more neutral edits have been accepted just fine... — Richard BB 12:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oh well, I guess I don't have enough standing in the boys club yet to make an edit to that particular article. Seems I've ventured across the line where Wikipedia becomes Agendapedia. IN MY OPINION ;) Good day. Wrestlover (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Static isn't violating WP:OWN just by disagreeing with your edit. I would have to agree with him: "fallacy" is a very opinionated word when used in this context. We should allow the reader to make their own mind up. We've stated that there was a rematch, but by saying that the tagline was a fallacy is your conjecture. Also, regarding the comments of mine you removed: you may be uninterested in what I had to say, but being overtly belligerent will only hinder your ability to be a part of this community. — Richard BB 12:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Really, I'd love for you to explain how my was in any way POV. The tagline for WrestleMania 28 was "Once in a Lifetime", which was confirmed as a fallacy when the WrestleMania 29 main event was booked in January. Since we're throwing around doctrines, here's one for you: WP:OWN. Wrestlover (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.