December 2016

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Names of God. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Auric talk 21:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

on conspiracy theories:

edit

on conspiracy theories:

THE FLIP SIDE Consider this:

If you hear the phrase “conspiracy theory” and you dismiss the theory without investigation because it happens not to agree with what you believe at this moment in time, or you dislike the source or if you see the words “conspiracy theory” in a negative light then you have learned nothing from history.

PROVE IT BEFORE YOU BELIEVE IT (2021.10.30 jdr)