Prop 93 dispute

edit

I added a source to back up how much longer a legislature could serve, settling on the wording "some current members would serve longer." In basic formulation, a member could serve 8 years in the Senate and then, after just being elected to the Assembly (with Prop 93 passed) serve 12 years in the Assembly for a total of 20 years. The new 12 year limit applied to the house the member was currently in. The maximum possible wasn't 8+6+12 because either the 8 or the 6 is 12. So, the limit would be 20 years under term limit law. But, to burst my bubble a little, some members, like Tom McClintock, served before term limits law passed previously, meaning he could serve up to 26 years. This last fact from the Chronicle article I cited. In short, it makes the most since just to say "some current members would serve longer."User:calbear22 (talk) 09:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Reverted Texas B.S. - I hope Texans know that they are as inferior, overrated, self conscious and overcompensating as China."

edit

Interesting sentiment-how do the two link, in your view? I am intrigued, and you don't have mail turned on. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Eloquent and insightful, thank you! Living in Japan, one does hear a lot from the Chinese, and growing up in Colorado, we heard it from Texas... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 20:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello. The external links recently added to Irvine, California and University of California, Irvine have been removed because they fell under Wikipedia's criteria of external links normally to be avoided as #12: "Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors." Thank you. Evil saltine (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply