Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for the contributions! We're always happy to have new Wikipedians with a serious interest in improving articles! As you can see, we're also very keen on maintaining a neutral point of view (or NPOV) in all articles. Unfortunately, some of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's NPOV policy, and have been reverted. There's a great article about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. We thank you for your interest in helping Wikipedia to be well-rounded in its presentation of controversial subjects, and look forward to being able to fully incorporate your contributions!
Susvolans ⇔ 12:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi. I am offended by your use of the word "nonsense". I endeavoured to write a balanced and accurate piece and I believe I made a reasonable success of it, given that I had to work with what I consider as "nonsense" from other contributors. I firmly believe that my contribution was as or more NPOV as most other contributions, frankly. Perhaps you might avoid using 'nonsense' when you are welcoming users. Wibblywobbly 14:09, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Additional note: Feel free to specify exactly where I used POV. Please be specific and point out where it was POV or inaccurate. I carefully used passive phrases such as "is considered" etc. A revert with "nonsense" is hardly a very constructive contribution is it? Wibblywobbly 14:20, 15 November 2005 (UTC)