 | This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Kumioko (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |  |
Kevin Gorman — Leaky caldron — Roger Davies: It really is too bad that no one has anything better to do than to shut me up for speaking out against Arbcom and abusive admins. You should know I will never stop trying to change those things on this project as long as this project exists no matter how many times you revert me. RBI will not work with me. In fact it will only make me more determined to get the message out. Whiskeyseed (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- By the way all you are doing is making yourselves look bad and making me look like more of a martyr. I never knew you hated me this much Leaky. Whiskeyseed (talk) 21:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Kumioko, I don't have any hate for you whatsoever. However, you are not here to build the encyclopedia, and beyond that, have been community banned. If you conitnue to make comments like this, especially with pings to specific people, I'll strip your talk page access. Go away for a bit, come back in six months, and try to take advantage of the standard offer if you'd like to contribute to Wikipedia. Best,Kevin Gorman (talk) 21:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- As an additional note, it is worth paying attention to the names that you listed. In the last few weeks, Roger has voted to admonish me in one of the silliest arbcom proceedings I've seen, and Leaky spoke against me at the same proceeding. None of us are exactly BFF's. When you have three people who don't get along perfectly taking action against you, you should probably take it as a sign. Best, Kevin Gorman (talk) 21:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Also Kumioko, If you check the previous ANI and AN I specifically never joined in the call for you to be site banned. But site banned you are and your disruption needs to be dealt with. Leaky Caldron 21:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- As an additional note, it is worth paying attention to the names that you listed. In the last few weeks, Roger has voted to admonish me in one of the silliest arbcom proceedings I've seen, and Leaky spoke against me at the same proceeding. None of us are exactly BFF's. When you have three people who don't get along perfectly taking action against you, you should probably take it as a sign. Best, Kevin Gorman (talk) 21:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)