July 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Moody Margaret Moves In has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Anonymi (talk) 11:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC) Reply

I might have misjudged a good faith edit. Sorry about that. (Anonymi (talk) 11:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC))Reply
I Don't think its fair for someone to pass judgement on something that they personally don't know anything about. The sources are there! And even things are in red that doesn't mean it wont be in blue soon! Just give me a day or two please! (talk)

I know for a fact that not all musicians on wikipedia fit that criteria! Certified gold in one country? Give me a break. How many indy punk bands go gold? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MurphyMcMurphy (talkcontribs) 17:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jokes edit

I wish I was, the IPs who have edited the article and added their opinions at the AfD just wouldn't stop removing the template. I didn't know what else to do.— dαlus Contribs /Improve 10:35, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Alper edit

Would you object if the page were re-written to be about Period Pains, given that they have achieved notability with a chart single? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 23:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Consciousness Paradox edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Consciousness Paradox, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consciousness Paradox. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Happy Editing! — 72.75.91.179 (talk · contribs) 13:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

My RfA edit

Thank you for your support in my recent RfA, which was successful with 58 support, 4 oppose and 1 neutral. Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Sunset Sound edit

Hi, I wonder if you would cast your eye over my AfD nom for this article, seeing as you were kind of involved in a related AfD for Jon Courtney. I cannot see any way that The Sunset Sound appears notable, and the article looks a sham. See what you think and if you can support the Afd then it would be much appreciated.Spoilydoily (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:CrapArticle edit

 Template:CrapArticle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 00:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Beautiful edit

User:Wheelchair_Epidemic/Article_Deletion_Squadron#Honorary_members I love it, particularly that section. Such an awesome article.

A shame that you only contacted editors who tend to delete articles, not us Article Rescue Squadron members.

Some of us know how to laugh at ourselves. Ikip (talk) 01:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

What made you come back to wikipedia? 22:34, 26 April 2009 was your first edit after 8 months (last edit 19:30, 23 August 2008) Ikip (talk) 01:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I would suggest that you move: User:Wheelchair Epidemic/CrapArticle into the deletion squad page: User:Wheelchair Epidemic/Article Deletion Squadron , because it is only a matter of time before someone abuses it again. This way it will not be deleted, and it is not under a risk of MfD, except if User:Wheelchair Epidemic/Article Deletion Squadron is deleted, in which case, there is a stronger case for it to be kept. Ikip (talk) 02:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating this. Too many people on both sides need a dose of humor. Edward321 (talk) 14:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

barnstar edit

  The Barnstar of Good Humor
I wish to award you this barnstar for bringing balance to the universe. Wikipedia:Article Deletion Squadron shows insight and perspective. Thank you for sharing. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:06, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Warning edit

This case involved personal attacks, and I found this one especially inappropriate.[1] Cool Hand Luke 02:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for 31 hrs for personal attacks edit

As an uninvolved administrator reviewing the series of 4 edits CHL just warned you about - [2], [3], [4], and [5], the first and last of those edits grossly breached our community expectations for civil user behavior.

I have blocked you from editing for 31 hours, due to the personal attacks and abusive behavior.

Please do not do this again. This is a serious project - we expect you to treat other participants with respect and basic human dignity, and act like an adult around here, and you should expect to be treated in that manner as well. When people behave otherwise, it degrades the quality of all participation and suppresses participation in the project.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 02:57, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Wheelchair Epidemic/Article Deletion Squadron edit

  User:Wheelchair Epidemic/Article Deletion Squadron, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wheelchair Epidemic/Article Deletion Squadron and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Wheelchair Epidemic/Article Deletion Squadron during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Atlantic306 (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply