I submitted an article - "Free Online Credit Reports" your editors because of the title ASSUMED it was spam - none even read it! The article explains how to contact the credit reporting agencies and government agencies to recieve your credit reports - no website is referenced at all that could be considered spam?! The only thing I can think of is that they confused AnnualCreditReport.com to be spam but that is the website created by the 3 reporting agencies as a central place to request credit reports! Look at this link https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/helpabout or even contact the reporting agencies themselves that is where you MUST go to requst a free credit report from them which is allowed once a year. I own USLister.com and you can see a copy of the article there at http://www.uslister.com/realty/resources/free-online-credit-reports.html and this information was purely informational and helpfull and spam free. I am now blocked as spammer what can I do? At least tell me where you think I spammed as I am at a loss.
William Flynn
Wflynn12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
REASON
Decline reason:
Your actions were against the basic rules and the fundamental nature of the project. You consistently recreated deleted content. You were probably blocked as a spammer because this smacks of self-promotion. — Vassyana 18:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Where were these smacks of self-promotion? The report made no mention of my website just the reporting agencies and government agencies needed to get a free credit report. As far as resubmitting I did this figuring someone would actually read the article before wrongly assuming spam but apparently they all just read the title and assumed it was spam as you did. I will not post on wikipedia anymore as I feel your editors are not doing a good job sorting out the spam. Everytime I challenge someone to point out the source of spam in this article they avoid answering this question. Everytime?