A tag has been placed on National Socialist Liberation Front, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Charles 18:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Photo06sarapaxton01.jpg edit

Hello Wewelsburg, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Photo06sarapaxton01.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Wewelsburg. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Falange.gif edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Falange.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Changing flags edit

Gidday, Wewelsburg. I'd like to gently point out that the Khmer Rouge flag you changed in various articles and templates is the result of a small historical incident in 1975 and some journalistic mix ups since then. Some web site incorrectly show this flag for the KR. See Talk:Khmer Rouge for details. The correct flag for the KR is the flag of Democratic Kampuchea. For reference, the relevant section of the DK constitution (which the KR promulgated shortly after their victory) describes the flag as follows:
Article 16. The design and significance of the Kampuchean national flag are as follows: The background is red, with a yellow three-towered temple in the middle. The red background symbolises the revolutionary movement, the resolute and valiant struggle of the Kampuchean people for the liberation, defence, and construction of their country. The yellow temple symbolises the national traditions of the Kampuchean people, who are defending and building the country to make it ever more prosperous.[1] Cheers, Paxse 10:03, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Falange.gif) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Falange.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Rebharp.jpg edit

 

Image:Rebharp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images edit

I had to remove an image from your user page. As per WP:IUP, we are not permitted to use fair-use images on user pages. --Yamla (talk) 14:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image / userbox edit

Looks like an IP came by and re-added the pictures and a rather divisive userbox. I removed both for you! Just say "NO" to WP:FUR 19:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Man,. I just see all your infoboxes... YOU ROCK! You are the best wikipedians I have seen!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.46.133.134 (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

question...? edit

What do you have against me emotion-free add-ons...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.155.117.106 (talk) 05:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

chicken edit

Why don't you meet me and fight, chicken!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.155.117.128 (talk) 17:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Mr. Lloyd, it is nothing personal. You simply do not deserve a paragraph on Wotanism. Or anything else.

I think you should answer this Mr. Lloyd Hardy. You are making up stuff on him, which is against the Wikipidia rules on conduct, Mr. Wlwesburg! Mr. Lloyd wrote a book and has a following. You should meet him and fight, unless you are chicken. Which you are! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.155.117.111 (talk) 07:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia supports fascism edit

Goddamned Nazi! 201.215.34.230 (talk) 04:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposal - a new scope for fascism task force edit

I have proposed a new scope for fascism task force. Please express your opinion in the task force's talk page. Thank you!

Sapere aude22 (talk) 08:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!