User talk:Wasell/Archives/2006

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Alphachimp in topic Thanks...

Pneumonic/Mnemonic

edit

You made a redirect page from Pneumonic to Mnemonic. "Pneumonic" has to do with breath; "mnemonic" has to do with memory. Please, check before redirecting. --Wasell 06:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I merely|mostly copied. This sort of semihomonym|homophone deserves disamb:

< http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pneumonic_devices&oldid=41058291 >.

Hopiakuta 06:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


Pneumonic/Mnemonic

edit

You made a redirect page from Pneumonic to Mnemonic. "Pneumonic" has to do with breath; "mnemonic" has to do with memory. Please, check before redirecting. --Wasell 06:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I merely|mostly copied. This sort of semihomonym|homophone deserves disamb:

< http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pneumonic_devices&oldid=41058291 >.

Hopiakuta 06:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


Please do read:

< http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pneumonic_devices&oldid=41058291 >.


Hopiakuta 06:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

A "pneumonic device" would be someting like a respirator or a ventilator. It is completely unrelated to memory and mnemonics, so your redircet is very misleading. I'll nominate it for deletion. --Wasell 07:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


That does not compute.

You've already redirected it.

Now, you, also want to delete it?

What are you deleting, exactly??

Please explain??

Hopiakuta 07:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yujn/Freiheit94

edit

FYI, User:Freiheit94 was blocked only for 31 hours (for now), therefore I removed Yujn's message. ←Humus sapiens ну? 20:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello Wasell

edit

Please see my comments on the discussion page of Ahmed Yassin. Thanks 74.92.77.194 16:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Need your help!

edit

A user, apparently an administrator reverted my edits to Ahmed Yassin and claimed they were vanadlism. They clearly were not and I was following all the guidlines. Who do I address this issue with. Please see edit history of Ahmed Yassin. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aljazzera44 (talkcontribs) .

The user (or admin), you're talking about is User:Avraham, right? I can't find where he called you a vandal, but I do see that he has called you an "idiot" [1] That is far beyond accepable! OTOH, you have called him an idiot [2]. This is equally unacceptable!
Let's all cool down and discuss this rationally on Talk:Ahmed Yassin.
My sugestion is that we do not use Category:Terrorists until we have reached an agreement. OK?
And let us all re-read WP:NPA and follow the wisdom therein. --Wasell 19:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Please read the edit summaries again. I was referring to myself as said idiot, Not Al-Jazeera. Since Al said something along the lines of the "idiot" didn't post on talk, I was pointing out that I did. It is a good idea to read everything very carefully before you throw accusations around   -- Avi 19:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Right you are! SORRY sorry sorry!!!!!!!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wasell (talkcontribs) 15:51, August 27, 2006 (UTC)
No big deal, thanks for the clarification  . As for Yassin being a terrorist, what's your take? (on the articles talk page ;) ) -- Avi 19:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
My take? I think it is completely obvious that he was a terrorist and that he should be labeled as such. But that's my POV. OTOH I'm not sure that Category:Terrorists is even usefull. If there were a Category:Desiganted terrorists, it would make our lives so much easier... --Wasell 20:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for you patience and understanding

edit

Even though we disagree on how Yassin ought to be labeled you have been very civil in your discussion. I apologize for calling that user an idiot but I also take issue with him accusing me of vanadalism and abusing his powers as an administrator by giving me a an unwarranted message that is now on my record. I think it's a very good idea that Yassin is not labeled anything until we reach a concensus, there are far too many dissenting voices. Thanks, Wasell! Aljazzera44 18:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey Wasell

edit

I just wanted to point out how nice you are to Israeli editors; responding with smiley faces and polite attention to their concerns. Yet, when a presumably Arab editor extends his cordial thanks to you, you totally ignore him. You're so racist, it's not even funny. Ciao, baby! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.56.191 (talkcontribs)

What on earth are you talking about? (And do read WP:CIV.) --Wasell 13:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey Wassel, This is [[[Those Debate Studs]]]. Can you post on our disscusion page on how to make an archive? 11:14 October 5, 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Those Debate Studs (talkcontribs)

(Answered here.)

hey how do you make a page on this website —Preceding unsigned comment added by Those Debate Studs (talkcontribs)

(Answered here.)

I made the article Qila Saifullah, and i know what it is about, it is in pakistan not afghanistan, so why is it part of wikiproject afghanistan? thats just stupid, and i think ur an idiot to put it there.

afd

edit

sorry about that. I am not as familar with the process as i should be. What do i need to do to complete the process? Thanks for any help Chris Kreider - HFF 06:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks...

edit

for the revert to my usertalk. I appreciate it. Alphachimp 19:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply