Warren85
Welcome!
Hello, Warren85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair\talk 22:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I have no obsession. Please remember to assume good faith when editing Wikipedia. The article on Tiffany Limos meets the basic requirements of WP:BIO and is therefore not a candidate for speedy deletion. As per your edit summary here, if you wish for the community to vote for the deletion of this article, take the article to Articles for deletion. Marking the article as a candidate for speedy deletion (which it is not) does not allow the community to vote. -- Longhair\talk 22:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I didn't know there was a difference. Thanks for fixing it up. Warren85 23:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Limos. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your comments will be removedŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 23:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 23:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- This is disgusting. I can't believe Wikipedia allows BIASED personal followers of groupies to be admins on this website. I guess there is no such thing as free speech on wikipedia. I don't see how anything I said in the comments (which are NOT a part of the article) could be considered "libel". Warren85 23:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
There is no free speech on Wikipedia. It has to conform to the law and your comments are without proof and libelous. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 23:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see how anything I said was "libelous". In fact, I could say the fact you are calling me libelous is libelous in itself. Saying somebody is a groupie (which they really are) is not libelous, especially when it is true. This girl has only got any of her jobs from being a groupie for old men in the film industry. It is also quite clear you are completely biased, and somehow closely connected to this Tiffany Limos. I am a bit surprised that somebody biased like you would be allowed to administrate Wikipedia. That's no matter though, we will find other ways to get our message out, especially now that I am aware that Wikipedia is censored more than a North Korean radio broadcast. Warren85 02:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)