May 2016

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Joseph Haydn, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been or will be reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 08:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Improper use of protection templates

Please stop adding {{pp}} to articles. The template is purely "ornamental" as only admins can protect articles. If you believe that an article should be protected, you should enter a request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Favonian (talk) 08:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You are being seriously disruptive The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia: Sandbox, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 7&6=thirteen () 10:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. Your early editing, adding protection tags to pages which were not protected, appeared to be vandalism, but it is just conceivable that it was some kind of misunderstanding. Your most recent editing, however, has clearly been pure vandalism, including such actions as creating a hoax article and linking to it from numerous other articles. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:33, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Wacky Wars (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19648 was submitted on Nov 01, 2017 10:43:16. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 10:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wacky Wars (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Note: Pls let Bbb23 know that this is my main and oldest account, not ZizizizizizizjzjzjzjzI zjzzjz. Bbb23 blocked my User:KMagz04 and User:ZizizizizizizjzjzjzjzI zjzzjz account after a CU check. I revived this account again after a month of my last edit as Wacky Wars. I request CU again to confirm that Wacky Wars is linked to my other sockpuppets. Change this block into checkuserblock if confirmed. I posted an unblock request because I could not email other admins. I am really sorry for abusing multiple accounts. Wacky Wars (talk) 05:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23: You might wish to look at this...unusual request. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 06:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Wacky Wars

  User:Wacky Wars, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wacky Wars and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Wacky Wars during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 01:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply