WJH3664

This account is a sockpuppet of WJH1992 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

February 2008

Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Luciano Pavarotti, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Dekisugi (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tanya Branning. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tanya Branning, you will be blocked from editing. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

^anemone│_projectors 21:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You got that a bit wrong, all you have to do is type {{unblock|reason}} literally as you see it on this page, only you must replace "reason" with the reason you think you should be unblocked. ^anemone│_projectors 21:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WJH3664 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason Is because yes I am User:WJH1992 and all the other names i.e. User:Babybubler92 etc.. I admit that Yes I know that I should <<NOT>> have done Sockpuppetry but you people nevr gave my an oppurtunity if you could please give me 1 more chance I promise NEVER to edit stuff that I probably should not for e.g. it was me that vandilised Reg Varney and the others I should NOT have done it but I promise from the bottom of my heart that I will never ever do anything like that again I do promise and if I ever do it again you people at Wikipedia BAN ME FOR LIFE my email address is blackdogbridgnorth@yahoo.co.uk if you would like to speak to me yours sincereley and Thank you WJH3664 (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your continued abuse shows quite clearly that you have no intention of abiding by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Yamla (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic