Bridge

edit

Would you be so kind as to revert Bridge. There is a concerted effort to keep that reference to bittorrent in there and I am at three reverts. Otherwise I will have to ask for partial protection on the page but I think if even one other editor backs me up the vandal will back off. Thanks --Justanother 14:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, you are right. Just I take a dimmish view of anonymous (or new) repeated attempts to insert something when the issue is under discussion and consensus may well be forming against. But, you are right, I was hasty there. --Justanother 15:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
I imagine User:Netslaveone is a sock though and that is probably the term I should have used "suspected sock". --Justanother 15:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Care to go again? Thanks --Justanother 15:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I was just looking at that when you "rang". I don't have evidence so I don't think it warrants a report. Perhaps if another sock appears. But if you can get the next one, if there is a next one, that would be great and you will be at three reverts. If it continues I will pursue it. Thanks --Justanother 15:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

removing warnings from talk pages

edit

I've repeatedly seen users temporarily blocked (and threatened to be blocked) by admins for removing warnings from talk pages. Nothing "mean" about it. wikipediatrix 15:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


Linking to homepages with critical information about living persons

edit

The reason why I asked the question at talk:Michael Moore is because I am involved in a dispute at Robert Priddy which deals with the same question i.e. a homepage maintained or authored by the subject of the artile that may violate WP:BLP if linked to. Andries 15:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


  The Editor's Barnstar
for keeping Notre Dame football free of vandals Notredamestudent 18:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ted Kennedy

edit

You should make unprotection request at WP:RFPP. Seeing as nothing's happened as far as the dispute is concerned, the decision of whether to unprotect the article may have to be made there. --Coredesat 01:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bruce Jacobs

edit

I just nominated for deletion the article you are engaged in an edit war with the anon over. You may want to give your opinion at the discussion. ObiterDicta ( pleadingserrataappeals ) 14:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply