VonFeigenblatt
Speedy deletion of Journal of Alternative Pespectives in the Social Sciences edit
A tag has been placed on Journal of Alternative Pespectives in the Social Sciences, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Journal of Alternative Pespectives in the Social Sciences edit
I have nominated Journal of Alternative Pespectives in the Social Sciences, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Alternative Pespectives in the Social Sciences. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cameron Scott (talk) 01:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC) Cameron Scott (talk) 01:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Unilateral recreation of deleted article edit
As you know, “Journal of Alternative Pespectives in the Social Sciences” was deleted on 1 November after proper nomination and discussion. (You were invited to participate in that discussion.) Your unilateral recreation of this article under a slightly changed title (prefixing the word “the”) on 15 November is unacceptable. If you persist in such action, then you will be blocked from edited Wikipedia. If you believe that the original deletion should be reconsidered, then open-up a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. —SlamDiego←T 02:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://journal.vpweb.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences edit
A tag has been placed on Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 22:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
April 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://xrefer.blogspot.com/2008/12/journal-of-alternative-perspectives-in.html, http://focusononline.blogspot.com/2008/12/journal-of-alternative-perspectives-in.html). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Repeated unilateral re-creation of deleted article edit
As you know, “Journal of Alternative Pespectives in the Social Sciences” was deleted on 1 November after proper nomination and discussion. (You were invited to participate in that discussion.) Your first unilateral recreation of this article under a slightly changed title (prefixing the word “the”) on 15 November was unacceptable, and you were warned against such edits.. Your second recreation (without the “the”) was thus worse. Although the article was speedily deleted for copyright violation, it would otherwise have been speedily deleted for being a unilateral recreation of a properly deleted article. Again, if you believe that the original deletion should be reconsidered, then open-up a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. If you persist in such unilateral re-creation, then you will be blocked from edited Wikipedia. —SlamDiego←T 02:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Further possible actions edit
(It is, of course, possible to create more than one Wikipedia account. But if one is caught doing using “sockpuppet” accounts to circumvent blocks, temporary blocks are generally made indefinite.)
You alternative, again, is to go to Deletion Review and make a case for recreation of the article. More than one article has been restored after discussion there. —SlamDiego←T 00:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)