Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Federation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - BillCJ 07:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

February 2008

edit
 

Hi, the recent edit you made to 1993 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 01:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to 1993, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jmlk17 01:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to 1993. · AndonicO Hail! 01:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Taj burrow and fanj.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Taj burrow and fanj.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply