Vivaan65

March 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page IBM Global Services has been reverted.
Your edit here to IBM Global Services was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/user/Consulting) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Your recent editing history at Bangladesh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Both of you have broken 3RR. Take it to the talk page. Meters (talk) 19:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

I'm giving the same warning to you as I gave the other editor. I usually block or extend the block of editors calling good-faith edits vandalism. Read WP:NOTVAND. This is your only warning. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:09, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Alright I will keep that in mind and not violate 3PR again.--Vivaan65 (talk) 07:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

WWIN

Hi, I accept that this material which you removed was unsourced but why was it undue and what does WP:WWIN have to do with it? I'm pretty sure the origins of Brahmoism and the role of that particular community in it should be fairly easy to source. - Sitush (talk) 04:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Well I have no problem if you can provide relevant sources to support the claim.--Vivaan65 (talk) 05:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)