Videosharingguy
Speedy deletion nomination of HonestFreeSpeech
editYou may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on HonestFreeSpeech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I deleted HonestFreeSpeech
editHello,
I regret to say that I have deleted this page that you created, HonestFreeSpeech, because it assert enough importance for our minimal inclusion guidelines. Please do not take this personally or as a reflection on your capabilities as an editor. If the article I deleted was not a copyright infringement, then you may ask me to provide you a copy of the deleted page to work on in your own space, which I will simply move the deleted page to User:Videosharingguy/HonestFreeSpeech. There you can work on the page until the issues are resolved. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. Thank you, MuZemike 23:33, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
importance or significance
editPlease note that the link you provided to Censorship by Google does not demonstrate the "importance or significance" of the HonestFreeSpeech article.
You may have overlooked the link you should review: Wikipedia:Notability (web), specifically the "Criteria" section, describes the Wikipedia guidelines to establish a website as "importance or significance". I strongly suggest you review that website. To demonstrate that the criteria has been met, it's beneficial to supply references to third-party reliable sources that confirm the guideline criteria is met by the site. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:35, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of HonestFreeSpeech
editA tag has been placed on HonestFreeSpeech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
editWelcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of video hosting websites has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Netalarmtalk 01:27, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- If you want to contest the speedy deletion of an article, please place the hangon tag on the article itself. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 01:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia is bogus
editIt's true! All resources are nothing more than fraudulent links on the web. This is NOT an Encyclopedia!
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of video hosting websites, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of video hosting websites was changed by Videosharingguy (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-10-25T03:51:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:51, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. tedder (talk) 05:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)