You must see the Olbrich references on the Ergonom 400 microscope. The data and photos from that scope prove that the Abbe limit was broken and may have been broken by Rife, plus there are many existing photos from Rife's scope. You cannot simply ignore (and delete) the reference from the Smithsonian publication which talks extensively about the magnification and resolution levels of the Rife scope.

Edit-warring

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Royal Rife. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Please take a look at our policies on appropriate sourcing, undue weight, and original research. The material you're introducing uses inappropriate sources, such as Google videos and self-published promotional websites, to make fairly far-reaching claims. Please discuss your proposed changes on the article talk page here, rather than continuing to insert them. MastCell Talk 17:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply