Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Vegard Vike, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nolelover 19:00, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

iron inlay?

edit

Could you comment on this edit? Are you saying we are mistaken about the nature of the inscription? Note that you changed "silver" to "iron" in the article text, but not in the infobox, creating a self-contradictory situation. Since you seem to be an expert on the topic, your knowledge would be greatly appreciated. --dab (𒁳) 10:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello Dbachmann. I'm new to editing in Wikipedia so I have not quite gotten used to the finess of it yet. My SÌbø sword edit (silver -> iron) was my first. I will try to comment my edit, and make som further clarifications. Vegard Vike (talk) 13:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the unimus.no link. But are we sure this is our sword? I find it strange that the blade inscription is not mentioned in the artefact description. --dab (𒁳) 12:14, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the museum number is verified in Loranges publication from 1889 with a detailed drawing of the same sword, he depictes it as table IV "...Haugfundet SvÌrd fra SÌbø i Hoprekstad, Vik i Sogn B. M. No. 1622 ...Indskriften paa den ene Side er med Runer og lÌses av Professor Stephens som: "oh ÞurmuÞ" (Thormod eier), idet HammermÌrket her bruges som Runetegn for Thor". In addition Jan Petersens (1919 p.66-77) also describes the sword from SÌbø with the number B 1622, and goes on to explain that it is unusual by having an inscription in runes as opposed to the usual latin inscriptions. Both Lorange (1889) and Stephens (1884) corroborates the catalogue text as to both the name of the find place, and the year of the discovery 1825. The find context of the sword, together with an axe and a horse bit in a grave mound, is also mentioned by Lorange. Vegard Vike (talk) 18:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:B1622 Lorange 1889 Tab IV.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Acather96 (talk) 17:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Viking Age arms and armour

edit

Hei Vegard! Jeg har med stor glede lest din og Kim Hjardars bok, og tenkte det kunne vÌre pü tide ü rydde opp i artikkelen Viking Age arms and armour. Lyst til ü vÌre med? Petter Bøckman (talk) 12:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hei pü deg Petter, alt for lenge siden! Hyggelig at du liker boka, det kommer forhüpentligvis en til, kun om vüpnene. Nür det gjelder ü rydde i Viking Age arms and armour og underliggende temaer, sü behøves jo absolutt det, og jeg er gjerne med. Om alt gür etter planen utgir jeg en egen bok om temaet høsten 2013, sü ideelt sett vil jeg foretrekke ü vente med mye av ryddeshauen til etter at arbeidet med boken er gjennomført, men om utgivelsen utsettes kan vi jo gjøre en større innsats tidligere. Det er jo bra at du er en drevet Wikipedian, ettersom jeg er en novise i disse trakter. Vi burde kanskje diskutert temaet over et par krus gjÌret byggbrygg :-) Vegard Vike (talk) 00:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply