Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VKFP for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Tærkast (Communicate) 14:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Aaaaand the WP:OWNer strikes again..... --talk VKFP |contribs 14:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Acroterion (talk) 14:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

So, who are you, "Acroterion"? Are you one of Taerkast's cronies? Or are you his sockpuppet? --talk VKFP |contribs 14:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Never heard of the guy. I'm a passing administrator who saw your obviously inappropriate edits and blocked you. Acroterion (talk) 14:40, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
That's what they always say. --talk VKFP |contribs 14:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VKFP (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

OVERTURN THIS ABUSIVE BLOCK

Decline reason:

No, Editor XXV. –MuZemike 15:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.