for me

June 2021

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Special administrative region, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HypVol (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Chamdo

edit

Please adhere to WP:NPOV as the word "battle" is more neutral than "invasion" which is the name used by the government-in-exile.--HypVol (talk) 23:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

The word invasion indicates that Tibet was a sovereign state prior to the battle, which is highly controversial. The fact that the corresponding article's name uses the word battle instead of invasion shows that the word battle is preferred and neutral.--HypVol (talk) 23:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

You are distracting my points. I'm talking abt invasion, a military and legal term that is well defined in international law.--HypVol (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

see the UN definition for invasion--HypVol (talk) 00:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

In case you don't understand, this is the Chinese version. --HypVol (talk) 00:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply