BLP violation removed

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Stephen Barrett ‎ . However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. That article is hosted by an organization known to promote unscientific methods and products. It is written by the main promoter of the anti-aspartame POV hoax and is filled with libelous and inaccurate statements. One amusing one is the assumption that Rosenthal is a doctor! No, sources that don't do any fact checking and publish such rubbish don't qualify as reliable sources here. -- Brangifer (talk) 07:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually...

edit

  This is your only warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Stephen Barrett, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MastCell Talk 01:09, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sock at work?

edit

Is this account being used by one of two indef blocked users: TB or IR ? A CU should be run. -- Brangifer (talk) 08:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply