User talk:UBX/zero-tolerance/Giuliani
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Ludahai
![]() | Userboxes | |||
|
[Removed uncivil comment insulting Rudy Giuliani, check history for details Abeg92We are all Hokies! 06:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)]. Abeg92 16:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not the world's largest fan of the gentleman whose photo appears in the zero-tolerance box ... but ... wouldn't a more proactive, positive approach be to design an alternate box? If you have time to do that, please share what you come up with here.
Keesiewonder 17:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Good idea. BTW, I'm sorry for the above comment. I will design an alternate, if I get around to it... Abeg92contribs 00:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not his biggest fan either, but who else do you associate with "zero tolerance for vandalism"? —Angr 05:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Good point.... Abeg92contribs 17:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Any endorsment of Rudy is going to be automatic grade A polemic, this template is just an end run around the CSD clause forbiding polemic userboxes. Either you replace the picture of Rudy with Image:Dinkins.jpg or I take this to TfD--172.130.15.210 12:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- What makes you think Dinkins is less polemic? Dinkins is not the one associated in the public mind with "zero tolerance on crime"; Giuliani is. —Angr 12:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- That's fine, we can continue this discussion on TfD--172.149.206.219 12:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- What makes you think Dinkins is less polemic? Dinkins is not the one associated in the public mind with "zero tolerance on crime"; Giuliani is. —Angr 12:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Any endorsment of Rudy is going to be automatic grade A polemic, this template is just an end run around the CSD clause forbiding polemic userboxes. Either you replace the picture of Rudy with Image:Dinkins.jpg or I take this to TfD--172.130.15.210 12:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
This whole discussion is silly. It is a USERBOX for goodness sake! The picture should stay, PERIOD! ludahai 魯大海 23:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)