Turquoise21
|
Removing sourced information
editHello. Thank you for your contribution to the article Sami Yusuf. However, when you remove sourced content from an article as you are doing here, we ask that you explain why. Since no reason has been given for the removal of the content, it has been restored. The source meets Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the content is consistent with information generally offered in biographies. If you remove sourced content from articles, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. Please go to the talk page to explain what you mean here by "lack of substantial citation". The information has been cited to The Independent, which is a major publication in the UK that meets Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. Your explanation there will be helpful in making that determination as to whether your removal is appropriate. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Sami Yusuf
editHello, Turquoise21. I hope you are doing well. I am not sure what point you were trying to make when you posted on my talk page. I am merely trying to prevent the Sami Yusuf page from becoming a subjective fan page. Wikipedia in an encyclopedia, after all. I'm sure you'll agree. Thank you.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 18:09, 26 March 2011 (UTC)