TulisaMarshall

It is currently 12:53 PM where this user lives.

Welcome!

Hello, TulisaMarshall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --CherryX

Re

The Phrophet Blog is a blog, and blogs on Wikipedia are not reliable as they are self published. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 17:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Your Profile

Hi Tulisa, I've created a time stamp for you here: User:TulisaMarshall/Userpage. You can go to that page to edit colours etc. Also by copy the following: {{User:TulisaMarshall/Userpage}} and pasting it on any variation of your userpage it will appear at the top. My "Lil-unique1" logo is just a picture created from photoshop which I upload to WP:UPLOAD and then added to the page: User:TulisaMarshall/Userpage. It will then appear on every page that has {{User:TulisaMarshall/Userpage}} on it. If you'd like me to update it for you please feel free to find a design you like and let me know. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 21:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Tulisa. I shall have a look for you when I get chance. There's lots of tools on the internet to design something. I shall design perhaps two for you and then you can tell me which one you prefer and I'll load it for you! — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

RE: Protecting Pages

You can protect pages by putting a request in at WP:RFPP however you cannot protect your page from users unless they're harrassing you. The talk page is there for users to contact you. I know the ones in question and they are good users. You should try engaging with them and let them know your new to wikipedia, I'm sure people will help once you've explained. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 16:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Sock puppertry (WP:SOCK), is an internet term. It means when another user thinks that you are using more than one account. It usually occurs if someone thinks your editing pattern is similar to previous user, usually someone who's blocked or banned. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. When you recently edited Raw Like Sushi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freestyle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

unblock:Wrongly accused

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TulisaMarshall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

OK, I've been wrongly accused of sock puppetry which I can say I'm 100% not a sock puppeteer, and what makes matters worse is there's not even a set expiry date so I could go as guilty until proved innocent, and ANOTHER insult is Kww has decided to blank my page and accuse me of sock puppetry, just 'cause some hooch has been on here causing problems, don't put me in the same category, I ain't happy about that, it's ruining my good reputation here and if anyone needs me to take a lie detecter test I will do it just to prove I'm not a sock puppet, all I do is on pages, let's say for example a Professor Green page, I would include the genre what's on his front page to his songs, which I don't see as a hanging offense and I will argue this point 'till I go to my grave; if you're not allowed two accounts how comes, I read this and I thought to myself "Are they for real?", some people are allowed two accounts, which to me, looks like a bit of contradiction 'cause there's me, who hasn't done anything getting accused of sock puppetry, but they allow it? Bit pointless ain't it? I would be grateful for someone to answer this ASAP

Decline reason:

Based on the behavioral evidence, especially that provided by Kww below, you appear to be the same person. Kinu ^t/_c 08:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've been told time and time again that you aren't permitted to edit until you post an unblock request using your MariaJaydHicky account and persuade someone to unblock you there. Given your history of constantly creating new accounts, it's extremely unlikely that anyone will grant it, but it's still the only method. Until then, every edit you make, either anonymously or using an account, is considered block evasion and will be reverted once it is detected.—Kww(talk) 18:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Go and get a HUGE stone and try and squeeze it 'till you've gotten blood out of it (from the stone and not from your hand), I have only ever had one (singular) account; "Tulisa Marshall" which is my name; got the passport, bank account, drivers license to prove it! I'm sorry Kww if you don't register it, but it is true, whoever (or whatever) that Maria girl is, I can honestly, hand on my heart say I am not her, if I was do you think I would have better things to do than go on here and being a right twat? I personally think this Maria thing is you, as you are so obsessed with her and I think you are going around on here as both Kww and Maria and every so often you find someone on here and think "I'll get them blocked and say they're Maria so that takes the pressure off of me by saying this person's Maria," I mean OK we all live in a bit of a pretend world, (I sometimes try and pretend I'm rich and famous, but doesn't any one?! ) But the thing is and I do hope you read this and think "It's time I come clean, Tulisa's right!" I haven't had any problems with any one on here (except for you!) I ain't done bad edits, I've even welcomed people on here so I don't see why I should be accused of something/someone who I'm not and never will be for as long as I've got a hole in my bum, so would someone who's impartial and a moderator, please be the judge, you've had you're say and I've had mine! Tulisa Marshall '♥ ^{Click On Me} 19:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Anyone reviewing this block should compare this conversation to this one, this one, and one of my all-time favorites this (which should be individually compared to this one, "bruv").—Kww(talk) 19:25, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

God you are pathetic, that IS nothing like me, apart from the one which says I had been here for a month if you do the maths (24th July - August is one month) is mine I'll hold my hand up, I swear to God, you are a Knobby No-Mates, if you have got several peoples comments and accuse me of them, I think you would find they were doing the same as me defending themselves. If you read what I wrote; so would someone who's impartial and a moderator, please be the judge, you've had you're say and I've had mine that would translate to not talk to me again! I will say this YOU must be really sick in the head, if you find this enjoyable, but it's alright Karma's gonna come around one day to you. I guess I would be stating the obvious if I said, you hate me and the feelings mutual honey, but it's the truth and so what I told that other bloke, that I ain't some fake, can't a girl defend herself?!Tulisa Marshall '♥ ^{Click On Me} 19:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Kww, if you had kindly read what AGK had wrote; I looked at TulisaMarshall's contributions, and noticed no obviously problematic genre changes. In many cases, the change to the track/album article mirrored the genre given on the artist's biography. When you say "unsourced", you may mean "not discussed"--which does not equate to "wrong". Closing without action, but also without prejudice to re-opening this investigation should further socking be suspected, nor to the submission of a complaint at a *conduct* community noticeboard. (SPI is inherently unsuited to complaints about a user's edits or conduct.) AGK [•] 12:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC) so you had no right whatsoever to stick your nose in, if you need to comment either AGK or Kww please write on here, I'll like to see what each other has to says. Tulisa Marshall '♥ ^{Click On Me} 20:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

unblock:Not who they say I am

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TulisaMarshall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Not who they say I am

Decline reason:

According to DeltaQuad there's technical evidence connecting you to the newest sockpuppets of MariaJaydHicky. Even without the technical evidence the behavioural evidence is strong. Huon (talk) 00:45, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Been away for a while and now I'm back and I want to clear this mess up once and for all; I was accused of being a sockpocket back in the day (well 31 August 2012 to be honest) and I am not; the reason why I've chosen to come back is because I've sorted out some personal shit in my life; won't bore you with the details and for anyone out there no it's not coke like Tulisa the singer it's personal OK?! And I want to clear my name and get myself unblocked, not a sock, never been a sock just been involved in a bullying/harassment issue on here (see above please) and I've now decided to apply to be unblocked so kindly see this and sort it out once and for all. Thanks. T Marshall AKA Tulisa Marshall Tulisa Marshall '♥ ^{Click On Me} 19:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

• Oh yeah; a little comment made from user:AGK about me; good read if I'm honest

“ I looked at TulisaMarshall's contributions, and noticed no obviously problematic genre changes. In many cases, the change to the track/album article mirrored the genre given on the artist's biography. When you say "unsourced", you may mean "not discussed"--which does not equate to "wrong". Closing without action, but also without prejudice to re-opening this investigation should further socking be suspected, nor to the submission of a complaint at a *conduct* community noticeboard. (SPI is inherently unsuited to complaints about a user's edits or conduct.) AGK [•] 12:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC) ”

meaning I was never in a million years meant to be blocked Tulisa Marshall '♥ ^{Click On Me} 19:50, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TulisaMarshall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Not a sock, never was and never had been

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Scott (talk) 05:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tulisa Marshall '♥ ^{Click On Me} 21:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TulisaMarshall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that people thought I was a sock; however, I am not and would like another chance on here to prove that I can behave in a civil manner and am here to build an Wikipedia and not use it to argue with people and will treat them in a civil matter. Tulisa Marshall '♥ ^{Click On Me} 11:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As you continue to not adequately address the reason for the block(for which there is strong evidence), and where a simple denial is not sufficient in sockpuppetry cases(as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so), I am declining your request and removing your access to this page to prevent more time wasting by all concerned. If you choose to address the reason for the block, you may use WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 11:36, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.