Tuftparsi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hi Everyone in Wikipedia, I was interested in Editing..I did mistakes early...by providing some wrong statements without any references and real news...it was all corrected by other editors themselves...and I was blocked once...now directly editing with my ID not the past account.. but now my true way of editing when I began to edit article Simran Bagga ... I found some of the mistakes in that article (almost wrong informations in Each paragraphs especially without any references...I removed them...but some Editors Like Ravensfire has not even considered my words..and undone my editing by mentioning me as "Rv sock of blocked editor GOOD morning" as his side's truth...but am like now truly wants to be a good editor...but my way of truthness is removing or undoing by Ravensfire on his personal Interest and Fan Madness over Simran Bagga.also in her List of awards and nominations received by Simran Bagga ,Fake nominations are provided without any references...also..others awards include two for her but mentioned 5 in the above column...which were the examples I have corrected but it was all removed by Ravensfire and mentioned me as a blocked one simply...what injustice is this ?????? now Dlohcierekim protected the page....Why can't he check what I did was justice or not..but suddenly undone what I have made the true informations.... he/she makes me again again again as a infected person (blocked one) but I was true..I am true...from few days back..I agree that I made mistakes ...but it was true way of editing... please consider me...& take compulsory action against Ravensfire. 117.230.183.213 (talk ) 15:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for making the SPI easy

Self-admitted you're a sock makes it easy. You need to deal with the block on your main account - GOOD morning and stop evading the block. Ravensfire (talk) 17:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked because you are currently blocked on another account, GOOD morning (talk · contribs). You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia unless the GOOD morning account is unblocked by an administrator (see Wikipedia:Appealing a block for how to request unblock). Please be aware that any edits you submit while the GOOD morning account is blocked may be reverted for no other reason besides that the GOOD morning account is blocked. Mz7 (talk) 01:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tuftparsi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes I agree I was blocked while I was Using my account....I apologise for what I have done.I am not allowed to edit Wikipedia unless the GOOD morning account is unblocked by an administrator as per Mz7's message. Actually I lost my passwords and mail (forgot) of GOOD morning & am not using that account.Again I apologise for that again & I willnot use GOOD morning & Wish to continue as an Editor & Filter in Wikipedia with my new account as Tuftparsi.I also appologise Mz7 & Ravensfire for whatever things felt them bad about me even they ignored me & tried to suppress me as an editor without considering my right way of editing & filtering towards some articles.They removed my contributions by marking me as a version of GOOD morning (talk · contribs) again,again & again.They were responsible for correcting , Advising & leading me but they were initially put me into black-market by saying multiple user.I lost my old ID,that's why am here as Template:Tuftparsi. Again I appologise & Request humbly to remove my block from both. Tuftparsi (talk) 16:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your first two edits were this where you try to mislead us about your block evasion and this where you blame others rather than admitting your block evasion. You then immediately engaged in mroe than ten edits in deliberate violation of your block. And your unblock request here doesn't address the problems with your original account ("WP:CIR, edit warring, abuse of multiple accounts and making incorrect sock charges." Instead, you rant and blame others rather than taking responsibility for your own actions. No, it would be totally inappropriate to unblock you at this time. Instead, I'm marking you as a banned user, under WP:3X. You may appeal this ban no sooner than six months from now, and only if you refrain from all further edits in the meanwhile. That means no edits on this account, no edits on any other account, no edits while not signed in to an account. No edits at all. Starting now. When you come back and ask the community to be unbanned, you'll need to address the issues that lead to your block and now to your ban. You'll need to stop blaming others and take responsibility for your actions. I have very little hope you'll be successful, but this is your only chance. Yamla (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{@Yamla (talk) Even I agreed my appology to you people,You see me as an accused person.This was not I expected actually.I expected justice in a positive way (even I accepted mistakes)

Anyway am leaving from Wikipedia.... & remember Karma is a bitch... Whatever you do (makes them hurt) to others will return to you in your life back... once or twice or more times...(You may take it as a reward way of your side,but replying simply as Excellent decision by me) Thank you for Your Ban Certificate.. Thank }}