TrueFuzz

Image tagging for Image:Desbarres.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Desbarres.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Removing warnings

If I were you, I would have a look at NeilEvans's user page and think again whether this person is a "retard" as you put it.--Seraphim Whipp 17:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I am unsure of what you are saying. But obviously a person who first removes alot of info that I contributed and had to rewrite (i didn't know the revert function) and then started deleting small sections, such as years and trivia is in my (and obviously that others users) mind retarded. TrueFuzz 12:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

You do not own the article. If the information you provided (how ever good) is not appropriate or relevant to the article then there is no point in it remaining on that page. Wikipedia is a community project and anyone has the right to edit any articles. I think you would do well to remember that before you start becoming hot-headed. --Seraphim Whipp 13:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

My information is accurate, NeilEvans only removes info. Logically my contribution is more valid. TrueFuzz 08:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Your contribution is only valid if it is verifiable. If your information is not then anyone can remove it with valid reason. --Seraphim Whipp 13:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Sock puppet

This is your last warning. If you continue to attack other editors as you did in your edit summary here,[1], I am bringing this to an admin where you will most likely be blocked from editing. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 13:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Aquinn1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aquinn1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Desbarres3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Desbarres3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BoydBowen for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 13:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:003104 61.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:003104 61.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Assistance please

{{helpme}}

I am being attacked by several accounts/editors and have alot of my contributions deleted (yes, valid and accurate). I am pretty new at wikipedia and I don't know how to report users. Watch the Brian Krause article for example. The years (accurate) in the infobox is being systimtically deleted for no reason except anger and a sense of owning the article everyone is supposed to be able to edit, in my case only adding valid info.

I edited the article according to our guidelines, in fact you were breaking the internal links to the other articles by adding the date inside the link. That sould be ok now. I suggest you not to attack other editors. Remember to criticize content, not people. NeilEvans was not very informative and helpful in its edits but he was right, you were breaking the article (not intentionally of course). Happy Editing! -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

I was "wrong"? Yet, the page looks the way I initially made it, after your edits. I think I will seize to contribute as this seems to be about personal "issues" rather that hard info...as usual. In the beginning he deleted alot more that the years and dates. i.e picture, all trivia, 2/3 external links. He was NOT "right". Just personal. A feeling of owning the page.

What I contributed: (aka. what NeilEvans deleted)

• Picture
• Height (from the man himself/I met)
• Notable roles + year/date
• Spouse + year/date
• Trivia (8)
• External links (2)

I would like to hear the truth be spoken, I would like you to admit that it was wrong of user NeilEvans to delete this info and I would like to hear that I was right. Maybe there was someting with these year/date links that needed to be fixed, but as described above, what NeilEvans deleted (first 10 times) had nothing to do with that issue.

TrueFuzz

Hello TrueFuzz,

In this case, I assume you are referring to the reverts done by NeilEvans (talk • contribs). In general, it is best to assume good faith, first of all, and try to enter into a civil discussion with the user(s) involved to try and determine their reasoning behind removing the material. You can do this on the article's talk page, or by leaving a message to the user involved on his/her User Talk page. To see which user(s) removed the material you added, look at the history of the article in question by clicking on the "history" tab at the top of the page.

More specifically, what's happening here is called an edit war. All the links I've provided contain useful information for this situation, including the dispute resolution process. I hope this helps. If you still have further problems, feel free to leave me a message here. —Xhantar^Talk 10:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Do you need help with anything else in particular? If so, please specify exactly what. Please do not add the {{helpme}} template again until you've read and followed the instructions at Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes. There really is not much more the people patrolling requests for help can do, at this stage. To summarize Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes:

• First step: Talk to the other parties involved
• Second step: Disengage for a while
• Further dispute resolution
  • Informal mediation: Request a mediator at Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal
  • Discuss with third parties and reach a consensus by looking at:
    • Wikipedia:Requests for comment - the main avenue for general disputes
    • Wikipedia:Third opinion - for disputes involving only two editors
    • Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts - for problems with uncivil editors
    • Asking at subject-specific Wikipedia:WikiProjects or policy pages relevant to the issue
  • Conduct a survey: Clarify the issues in the discussion
  • Mediation: Request mediation
• LAST resort: Request for Arbitration

Also important: All parties should be aware of the three-revert rule. If ignored, you will be reported at the relevant administrator noticeboard and might be blocked from further editing. This includes blanking your user talk page.

Thank you. —Xhantar^Talk 18:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

You obviously do not seem interested in being helped or trying to resolve this dispute. As such, I've reported your continued disruptive behavior as a violation of the three-revert rule at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. —Xhantar^Talk 19:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Just a note that the result of the mentioned WP:3RR report is: "No block". Comments by admin William M. Connolley: The 3rd feb edits are essentially stale, and you should be reporting BB for them anyway. Its not 3RR since. I see abusive edit summaries from the 6th for which he has been warned but none since then. Have a fantastic day! —Xhantar^Talk 22:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

The place to discuss content disputes is on the talk page of the article - in this case Talk:Brian Krause. Commenting on the talk page is the first and most important step for both dispute resolution and building a consensus about the page content. There may be reasons behind all these edits - for example, adding the height may be against Wikipedia's no original research policy - but the only way to know why something was removed is to challenge it on the talk page.

Wikipedia's policies forbid edit warring and repeatedly reverting content because they are damaging to Wikipedia. Using edit summaries like "REVERT RETARD VANDALISM" may easily be seen as incivility.

Please try to resolve this dispute on the article's talk page. --h2g2bob 18:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:JasonP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JasonP.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ruz45.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ruz45.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Rogdal56.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Rogdal56.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RyanPh.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RyanPh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Shmuley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shmuley.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:SDorff.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SDorff.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Angr 11:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Helpme request

{{helpme}} How do I delete my account?

Accounts on Wikipedia can't be deleted (this is for legal reasons; if you've ever edited anything, the account needs to be kept so that the change can be attributed, as required by Wikipedia's copyright licence). However, there is no reason why you can't simply abandon this account (and start a new one later, if necessary). You can also request the deletion of your userpage by placing {{db-user}} on it (although it's blank at the moment), and you can make the same request for your user talk page the same way (although requests to delete a user talk page aren't always accepted by administrators). Hope that helps! --ais523 08:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Final Warning

If you remove legit warnings from your page again, you will not be able to edit your talk page. As well, you may be blocked for the constant vandalism of pages. -Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 17:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:JaBo1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:JaBo1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rogerda.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rogerda.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:DesBarres1.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DesBarres1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

How do I delete my user talk page(s)?

As a matter of practice user talk pages are generally not deleted, barring legal threats or other grievous violations that have to be removed for legal reasons; however, exceptions to this can be and are made on occasion for good reason. Please refer to right to vanish). -- Jreferee T/C 17:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)