Tropicaltorque2244

Blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tropicaltorque2244 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This account is not a sock puppet. It was not created for illegitimate use or to violate Wikipedia policy. There is no justification or reason for this block. Please remove it.

Decline reason:

Nice try in reviving this old account to evade this block. Appealing a checkuser block while engaging in sockpuppetry is an automatic decline.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tropicaltorque2244 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? I don't have an "old account". As mentioned above, I have not engaged in sock puppetry. Again, please remove this unjustified block.

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so. This is a checkuser block, meaning there is technical evidence to support it. If you aren't a sockpuppet, you will need to explain why the technical evidence might indicate otherwise. It's pretty clear to me just based on your behavior that you are a sock, anyway. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tropicaltorque2244 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What else am I supposed to do to prove I'm not a sock puppet? This is the only Wikipedia account I've ever had. Other users have access to the same wireless network and computers, that's about as technical as I get. Pretty clear based on what behavior? I haven't done anything here yet! Doesn't declining my request ignore the 'good faith' policy???

Decline reason:

A one edit user citing good faith? That stretches my ability to assume good faith. Considering this is a CU block, you'll need to provide some more information regarding your computer setup to prove you aren't a sock. You can do that privately, but as it is pretty clear you are a sock, I highly suggest you stop socking for a good long while (6 months at the minimum) and then try appealing on your original account. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 18:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tropicaltorque2244 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What information do you want? As previously stated, this IS my original account. I am not a "sock", and I'm pretty sick of this bullshit. Tropicaltorque2244 (talk) 21:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Request declined and talk page revoked. Salvio 19:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.