Tricky Victoria
I have a few weeks off line (PC problems) and on holiday and I find my talk page being savaged. What has happened? Anybody?
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ram four ever, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ram four ever is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ram four ever, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
editRegarding The Honky Tonk Man, thank you for your recent revert of that IP editor. I also appreciated your edit summary of "how sad", it made me laugh. Raven1977Talk to meMy edits 17:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Northwich Victoria
editJust logged into find loads of stuff about you. It looks like it's getting harder for you having to do lots of edits, before your main edits. Is it worth the effort x
Hello there, me old fruit!
It is true that it's getting harder for me with having to put in ten edits before I can use my accounts. They sometimes get spotted and blocked whilst I'm making the ten edits, especially if I've just used an account and especially if User:Hut 8.5's online. I have generally targeted a dormant user talk page or tagged my own sockpuppets to achieve the ten edits.
It is not too difficult yet. User:Raul654 has put in loads of IP rangeblocks which do restrict me. I can generally get on using BT.
There seems to be a concerted effort now by many different users to revert my edits quickly. I suppose a good measure of my effectiveness is the percentage of the time that my edits are visible, or whether the page is fully protected. That percentage is very low at the moment. VICS is fully protected, but Northwich Victoria F.C. and Witton Albion F.C. are not.
It is worth the effort; I still hate the whole Wikipedia concept of truth by consensus. I can cope with being reverted within minutes by many different editors, being checkusered regularly and blocked on sight. User:Raul654's checkuser investigations are only about 95 - 98% accurate in terms of percentage of accounts that he labels actually being me.
I have included your message to me because User:Tiptoety has been deleting my user and user talk pages in bulk. It's the old don't talk to him, he's nasty routine.
I still think it's funny that people like to assert that I'm a banned user eg here despite the fact that User:Tile join doesn't appear here. x
TiJEiW (talk) 18:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gooro ole (talk • contribs)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)