Yo! edit

I don't know what happened, but I'm posting this. I'm trying to post at work, so I don't know if somethign happened or what ...

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
TribeCalledQuest (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
167.102.227.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism-only account


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You do not appear to be autoblocked, nor does your actual account appear to be blocked. Can you please copy and paste the entire contents of the block message you are receiving? Thank you, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, it does seem a little askew ... oh well, I assure you I couldn't edit earlier. Thanks anyway. TribeCalledQuest 14:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Criticism of Holocaust denial:Jewish population figures edit

A couple of years ago, you entered a question regarding this part of the "Criticism" article, which article I consider total POV.

Anyway, I resolved the issue described in the article, and plan to remove the issue, for reasons I describe on that article's Discussion page under this heading. Just in case you're interested. If you mean to consult the Almanacs themselves, I can help you with page numbers, etc., all of which I plan to document. Notify me on my Talk page.

The resolution of the issue is something that just makes me shake my head over the stupid stuff that sets people so at odds with each other.--Joe (talk) 02:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply