Tremmy
Welcome and introduction
editHi, Tremmy. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person by golly! And this real person (that would be me), wants to say welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've made an account! Thanks for joining; you're on your way to making some great contributions.
Because I've noticed you've just joined, I wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. Any questions are fine, nothing is too silly (we've heard them all). Now, the tips below - hop on them - they should help you begin editing. Best of luck! JoeSmack Talk 20:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. (You'll want to sign your name with these four tildes ~~~~ when you leave something on a talk page to help know who you are!) Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia! |
P.S. If you just feel like poking around, Wikipedia:Help is a good place to start. :)
Hi... um, how can I put this politely? Oh! This should do it; do not presume to come in and command anyone to do anything... vandalism, threats, and attempts at intimidation will be met with all appropriate action... do yourself a favor, and pop over to the talk page to see who changed it and why, before making another foolhardy statement implying that you can control what occurs on this website... many editors slaved over this page for months before a general consensus was reached... you have no right to make a change which goes against a standard that was agreed upon, before the page was unlocked to be edited again... Magus732 (talk) 03:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Tremmy's Response to Magus732
editOk, now how should I put this politely? I won't bother - you're wrong and I'm about to explain why.
Who, aside from you, ever said it was agreed upon? From what I read, it was universally REJECTED! To quote Wrestlinglover, "but here we got guidelines a editors opinions to decide. The majority is clearly against you in this mater. You are also in danger of a 3RR. Don't revert again". That was aimed at CraigMonroe, who wrote the edit in the first place. GaryColemanFan also took exception to it, so how can it ever be an 'agreed-upon standard' when several more people disagreed with it than agreed with it? Idiot.
- Be careful who you call an idiot, Tremmy... those words may haunt you later... as to your "response", if you actually read the whole talk page from top to bottom, you'll see a consensus about the page was reached... Magus732 (talk) 03:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
"While I would advise both editors involved here to calm down, Magus is correct. There was a consensus reached on the appropriate style of the article. GaryColemanFan is a dissenting voice, as is his right, but the wording as it stands is believed to be a fair and impartial version. If you would like to discuss changes to it, feel free to do so on the talk page of the article, as I see you have done, but be advised, you are not likely to receive much support. Sephiroth storm (talk) 06:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)