Tom140996

Welcome!!

Hey guys, my names tom and im 11 years old!! You can use tis talk page as a stress lounge so you can spam!!! but if a wikipedia admin deletes it, its not my fault. so yeah, you can comment or make a new topic using the + button at the top of the page!! L8rz. If you would like to experiment (test edits), please feel free to use my sandboxTom140996 06:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

These are a few of my faviourite things!!

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

August 2007

1. Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Sandahl 17:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User talk:Daanii10 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -download | sign! 04:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sex Banning

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sex Banning, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bagheera (talk) 01:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Your vandalism

I have reverted your gratuitous and unfunny edit here and can only hope you will be blocked if that is your attitude to Wikipedia. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the gracious reply, Tom. I hope good faith will one day win out. Meanwhile (yawn) we wikipedians have the numbers and the patience to fend off your self-amusement until you grow up or buzz off. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 04:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Casio HS-8

The article Casio HS-8 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject. Notability has been challenged since 2010 and never established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 12:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)