Tobit2

Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		For your tireless work and improvements to the Adoption articles! BastunBaStun not BaTsun 09:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Adoption assessment log

Just a quick note, the log shows what was changed from day to day. You still have the totals, but they do not show how people have worked on the articles. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 21:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Foster care

This borders on recruitment, or whatever it is called. The two editors and myself have been having a discussion on the talk page of Foster care. Without going into specifics, it appeared to me, that, at best, the articles regarding tiny parts of the world (Oregon, for example} should be placed ihto a separate article, at best. It is distracting to have stuff not really related to foster care in the article. As I mentioned, the editors are used to "place" articles, where everything is automatically put into the article.

This is not the case with concept articles like foster care, or policy, or whatever. Nothing wrong with summarizing and pointing. They naively consider this "censorship" which is furthest from my heart since I have no great love for this topic, as a topic per se. Only stumbled on it a month or two ago and forgot to remove it from my watchlist. Now reluctant to go until more than one veteran editor can help watch it! Student7 (talk) 11:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject: Orphaned, abandoned and removed children listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:WikiProject: Orphaned, abandoned and removed children. Since you had some involvement with the Template:WikiProject: Orphaned, abandoned and removed children redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kumioko (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:FoundlingWheel Dublin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FoundlingWheel Dublin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:05, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File:SisterIreneNYFH.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SisterIreneNYFH.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 04:36, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Adoption-related works

Category:Adoption-related works, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement

Category:Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Orphan Train William Thomas.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Orphan Train William Thomas.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

"Template:WPO&F" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:WPO&F. Since you had some involvement with the Template:WPO&F redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Magioladitis (talk) 13:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:AdopteeReunion.jpg

The file File:AdopteeReunion.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:22, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

File source problem with File:CharlesLoringBrace.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:CharlesLoringBrace.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 12:52, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:OpenRecords our SML3.png

Thanks for uploading File:OpenRecords our SML3.png, which you've attributed to Dory Martin. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)