If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Thad McIntosh Guyer, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. GregJackP (talk) 00:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Thad McIntosh Guyer

edit
 

The article Thad McIntosh Guyer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

* This biography of a living person needs additional references or sources for verification.
  • It needs references or sources that appear in third-party publication.
  • The notability of this article's subject is in question. While the subject has written a few legal articles, there is nothing significant. One book authored in 1977 that is in 33 libraries. Very limited hits in GScholar, nothing in GNews. According to Lexis, was attorney of record in 18 cases in U.S. Circuit Courts, no U.S. Supreme Court appearances.
  • It may have been edited by a person who has a conflict of interest with the subject matter.
  • It is an autobiography, or has been extensively edited by the subject, and may not conform to NPOV policy.
  • It may contain improper references to self-published sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregJackP (talk) 03:12, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply