User talk:Titanium Dragon/Archive 6
BCE/BC edit
If you think it is time for another discussion, you are probably right - there are many more active editors at Wikipedia than when I forwarded my proposal. The way to do it is to make a formal policy proposal, and announce it widely (I posted notes for the various RfC topic categories; now we have the Wikipedia Times as well). I think as before, it will be important to provide a rationale. My only advice: when you have time, reread my original proposal and the vote/discussion, and learn from my mistakes. The main value of my proposal was, in provoking wide discussion, we got to see the range of major views and what issues matter to editors. Good luck, Slrubenstein | Talk 13:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Left you a comment on the talk page. Best, Miguel Chavez (talk) 19:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Introduction to evolution edit
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Introduction to evolution. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Introduction to evolution (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)