Possibly unfree Image:Clarksburg_Anchors.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Clarksburg_Anchors.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Austin Tigers.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Austin Tigers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Note that taking a photograph of an image on a computer screen does not mean it is a "self-made" image that you own the copyright to (and can put in the public domain). Yes, you took the photo yourself, but it is an image of a copyrighted work by someone else, and hence a derived work. If you created your own drawing of a copyrighted work by someone else, it would still be a derived work. For derived works you need the permission of the copyright holder of the original image in order to distribute the work. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Alburcurque Satans.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Alburcurque Satans.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:TampaBees.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:TampaBees.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC) .Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Beavers.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Beavers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Orlando Beavers.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:Orlando Beavers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tampa Bees.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:Tampa Bees.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Saint Paul Boars.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:Saint Paul Boars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Kansas City Bulldogs.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kansas City Bulldogs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Anchors.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anchors.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do NOT blank this page

edit

Tim, do NOT blank this page to remove the non-free image notices; other editors need to see that you have been posting non-free images, and that you have been notified, when they decide on the status of those images.

—Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Boars.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Boars.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Bulls.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bulls.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Sante Fe Cats.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sante Fe Cats.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Cobras.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cobras.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:San Diego Comets.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:San Diego Comets.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Toronto Coyotes.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Toronto Coyotes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:New Orleans Crocs.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:New Orleans Crocs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:New York Deers.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:New York Deers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:New York Dolphins.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:New York Dolphins.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC) .Reply


Just delete them all

Possibly unfree Image:Quebec Dragons.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Quebec Dragons.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Salt Lake City Eagles.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Salt Lake City Eagles.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC) .Reply

Steve just delete them all for me

Possibly unfree Image:Tacoma Engineers.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tacoma Engineers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC) .Reply

Steve do me a faver and delete them all for me and thanks a lot that took me 3 to 4 days to take all of those pictures
They will be deleted when the images work their way through WP:PUI; I'm not sure whether the policy allows me to delete them myself. Sorry you wasted your time taking and uploading them...unfortunately, you are also wasting our time by posting images that we have to go through and tag and delete. You need to learn a bit more about copyright law before you post more images to Wikipedia. The general rule is that, for a copyrighted image (= every image, pretty much), there is no way to "get around" copyright law (e.g. taking a picture of the image, drawing a copy of the image, etcetera, all create "derived works" that are illegal to distribute without permission). (There are very narrow fair-use exceptions to this, but they are subtle and it is better not to deal with them.) —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Steve

Image:094.JPG listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:094.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 07:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

MTMWIKI

edit

I'm not sure about how dragging works, you can ask on http://mtm2draggers.net --Kmaster (talk) 23:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Bengals

edit

Well, I was talking about both that and your changing of the Browns' PA from 118 (correct) to 113 (incorrect). Both the Ravens and the Bengals have equal division records (both 1.000, regardless of whether it's 1-0 or 2-0). It goes to common games after that - only the Browns, both beat them. So then it goes to conference record, where the Ravens have a .750 record and the Bengals a .667. ESPN has this order in their standings and I'm assuming they're determined by computer. Also, what's up with your edits to the AFC East standings? You reverted to an older version with different formatting. Pats1 T/C 00:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, It goes by percantage and not more wins or losses than the other team. That is what you got to keep in mind. On NFL.com they have those tiebreaking scenarios. You should read it. Ositadinma 00:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ties in records

edit

Your assistance is appreciated, but please do not add zero ties to NFL team records, just keep the team at 2-0 rather than 2-0-0, for example. Thanks. Useight (talk) 20:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Again, please stop adding zero ties to NFL team records. Useight (talk) 20:37, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
The reason is standardization. All the team pages look the same in this regard, which looks much better than having the eight you changed today different from the hundreds upon hundreds of others. Take a look at the teams' articles going all the way back to 1920 - none of them show the number of ties unless it's greater than zero. Useight (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Updating NFL standings templates

edit

When updating the NFL standings, please ensure you have the PF and PA correct. You had the following incorrect today: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Thanks. Useight (talk) 23:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

KC Chiefs 2011 season

edit

Until the game tonight they are 3rd in the division, if they win, they will be tied for 2nd place, a loss an they r tied for 3rd. Don't factor in tiebreakers, even if you did, the Chargers have a lower win %.--Rockchalk717 (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Tim103093. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 21:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Tim103093. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Tim103093. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply