User talk:Thorncrag/Archive/July 2010
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Netalarm in topic Long-term abuse criteria development
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I've responded. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 09:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Ping Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 08:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Long-term abuse criteria development
As we did at abuse response, a new set of criteria needs to be developed at long-term abuse to ensure an easy to understand project. Since we both worked on the new abuse response and this seems similar, I think we can develop criteria to be presented.
What I have in mind:
- The user must have a sockpuppet category. (this shows long-term abusive behavior, but is highly redundant with SPI)
- The user must have at least 1 blocked account. (shows disruption)
- The abuse must have continued for a least 6 months. (long-term)