Thomaslorenz725

Karaca Dağ

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Botterweg14 (talk) 04:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

@Botterweg14 It is interesting that you had long ago supported those changes as visible in the history. It was not I that have added this, I reactivated what had been online for a long time before I even touched this article and wrote most of its content. What is your interest in such an article about a mountain in Turkey? Had you been there, are you doing any studies, or are you simply here to oppose God and belittle Christianity because it is not empiric for you?

Have you even made the effort in those few minutes between my redaction and your answer to read through the Eden study? (Redacted) 05:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

And please apologize, but there is no hint that 'journal' means a physical journal. It appears to be an category within your system and nobody would assume that a factual journal could be meant. Creation science is simply the category I thought coming closest to the content of the article. I suggest you, as you appear more experienced on this platform or eventually even one of the supervisors, to simply correct such mistakes (or to make the insertion of links easier, without the need of adding multiple parameters and to read through lengthy articles how to insert a simple link). I saw in the history that you protested already in the past, but the journal entry was still included when I first modified the article, and I simply took it from there and added the word 'Creation'. It is also weird to assume that there is a journal with the name 'Science'. Thousands of journals include both the wording 'Science' or 'Creation Science'. Thomaslorenz725 (talk) 08:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure I follow, but the point is really just that Wikipedia runs on reliable sources and the sources in your edits were not reliable. Botterweg14 (talk) 14:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)