Comments Welcome

edit

Schulte paper

edit

The reason that this isn't acceptable, is that the paper in question is:

  1. Not published - see: WP:SPS
  2. If it had been published - then it would have been in a non-reliable source. See: Energy and Environment
  3. Will not be published - see: [1]

Apparently several sceptical sites "jumped the gun", and published details about the study, before it had been through a review process. We've had discussions on this paper before (for instance here or here) --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 14:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply