There's a chance that this is a vandal account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

There's a chance that this is a vandal account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My username only revealed that there was a CHANCE that this was going to be a vandal account, not that it was necessarily going to be one. Rather than being so hastily blocked, I at least deserve a chance to edit so that you guys can judge whether I make useful contributions or vandalize with this account. The stunning lack of WP:AGF that I've just encountered is enough to make me just get up and quit the project altogether.

Decline reason:

No thanks. There are an infinite number of other account names at your disposal. Read WP:POINT. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked because this username breaches Wikipedia's policy on usernames. Please create another username with a title which is allowable per Wikipedia's policy. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 13:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)